[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160927120442.GF12981@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:04:42 +0200
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: set NR_syscall_tables appropriately
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:30:07AM +0200, Marcin Nowakowski wrote:
> Depending on the kernel configuration, up to 3 syscall tables can be
> used in parallel - so set the number properly to ensure syscall tracing
> is set up properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h
> index e558130..71162f3d 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
> #define NR_syscalls (__NR_O32_Linux + __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls)
> #endif
>
> +#define NR_syscall_tables (1 + \
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS32_O32) + \
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS32_N32))
> +
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
NR_syscall_tables is a new symbol but I don't see any users of this
symbol?
Ralf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists