[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82120249-b6c9-2772-427a-d7318c019a8c@imgtec.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:58:00 +0200
From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
CC: "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: set NR_syscall_tables appropriately
On 27.09.2016 14:04, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:30:07AM +0200, Marcin Nowakowski wrote:
>
>> Depending on the kernel configuration, up to 3 syscall tables can be
>> used in parallel - so set the number properly to ensure syscall tracing
>> is set up properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>
>> ---
>> arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h
>> index e558130..71162f3d 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h
>> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/unistd.h
>> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
>> #define NR_syscalls (__NR_O32_Linux + __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls)
>> #endif
>>
>> +#define NR_syscall_tables (1 + \
>> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS32_O32) + \
>> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS32_N32))
>> +
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> NR_syscall_tables is a new symbol but I don't see any users of this
> symbol?
>
Hi Ralf,
Patch 1/2 from this series did make use of that symbol.
However, this patch has now been superseded by a slightly different
approach following a discussion on the original proposal ...
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/16/57
Marcin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists