linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] elevator: remove second argument in elevator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALW4P+JmFGm5BR3OEUQjC9zJs+tjwrEAV_O0WL3W8yo5yBFmEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:13:45 +0100
From:   Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] elevator: remove second argument in elevator_init()

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 05:31 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Last user of elevator_init() with non-NULL name as second argument
>>>> that supposed to be s390 dasd driver has gone few releases ago.
>>>> Drivers rely on elevator_change(), elevator_switch() and friends
>>>> for example. Right now elevator_init() is always called as
>>>> elevator_init(q, NULL).
>>>>
>>>> Patch removes passing of second name argument and its usage.
>>>>
>>>> While we're at it fix following if-check after removed lines. We know
>>>> that elevator_type e is initialized by NULL and need to check only
>>>> chosen_elevator.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> what is the status of this patch? Is it that wrong and are there some
>> concerns or do I need to resend it?
>
>
> It looks fine, I'll pick it up for 4.7.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe


So, I guess this one was lost: I can't find it in the tree.
Looks like the easiest way will be to rebase (and check that it's
still fine) and resend. Right?

Best regards,
Alexey.