[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160929101040.GV5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:10:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel-request@...ts.xenproject.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
will.deacon@....com, kernellwp@...il.com, jgross@...e.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, bsingharora@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:45:10AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> change from v2:
> no code change, fix typos, update some comments
>
> change from v1:
> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted
> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro.
> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
> add more comments
> thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion.
>
> This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues.
So I really like the concept, but I would also really like to see
support for more hypervisors included before we can move forward with
this.
Please consider s390 and (x86/arm) KVM. Once we have a few, more can
follow later, but I think its important to not only have PPC support for
this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists