[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877f9usxmc.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:23:39 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Manish Narani <manish.narani@...inx.com>
Cc: k.opasiak@...sung.com, r.baldyga@...sung.com,
peter.chen@...escale.com, mnarani@...inx.com,
John.Youn@...opsys.com, eu@...ipetonello.com,
i.kotrasinsk@...sung.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anuragku@...inx.com,
punnaia@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH] usb: gadget: Configure bulk maxburst through module parameter in gadget zero.
Hi,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:16:44PM +0530, Manish Narani wrote:
>> This patch adds support to configure bulk maxburst through
>> module parameter. This parameter can be used to modify bulk
>> maxburst in case if one wants to measure peak Bulk/Isoc-IN/OUT
>> performance.
>
> Eeek, this isn't the 1990's, please don't add new module parameters :)
>
> We have much better ways of handling configuration options for a device,
> why not use them (configfs, sysfs files, etc.)?
>
> Ugh, it looks like iso_maxburst is handled this way as well.
>
> Felipe, why is this?
Yeah, g_zero has a few module parameters. In fact many of the gadget
drivers have them. This is all legacy stuff, pre-configfs. We can't
simply remove the legacy gadget drivers and tell everybody to start
using configfs ;-) That's what we want, no doubt.
That being said, we're not taking any new module parameters to any of
the gadget drivers OR UDC drivers. Anything new is configfs-only. Legacy
gadgets only get bug fixes.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (801 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists