linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] pipe: move limit checking logic into pipe_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1475160742.2027.2.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:52:22 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, socketpair@...il.com,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] pipe: move limit checking logic into
 pipe_set_size()

On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 13:26 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 02:21 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > This is a preparatory patch for following work. Move the F_SETPIPE_SZ
> > limit-checking logic from pipe_fcntl() into pipe_set_size().  This
> > simplifies the code a little, and allows for reworking required in
> > a later patch that fixes the limit checking in pipe_set_size()
> 
> > +	if ((too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(pipe->user) ||
> > +			too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(pipe->user)) &&
> > +			capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > +		return -EPERM;
> Some might say the indentation is off here. Not sure why checkpatch
> didn't care.

Parenthesis alignment is a CHECK not a WARNING.

It's only reported with --strict or if the code is
in drivers/staging, net/, or drivers/net/