linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 17/26] intel_telemetry_debugfs: constify local structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1609290716550.3288@hadrien>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:19:21 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
cc:     Souvik Kumar Chakravarty <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>,
        joe@...ches.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/26] intel_telemetry_debugfs: constify local
 structures



On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Darren Hart wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:05:59PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> Hi Julia,
>
> > For structure types defined in the same file or local header files, find
> > top-level static structure declarations that have the following
> > properties:
> > 1. Never reassigned.
> > 2. Address never taken
>
> Hrm. telem_apl_debugfs_conf is passed to the TELEM_DEBUGFS_CPU macro as the
> second argument "data":
>
> #define TELEM_DEBUGFS_CPU(model, data) \
> 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, (unsigned long)&data}
>
> And the address is taken, and later assigned to the debugfs_conf pointer.
>
> The usage still seems OK, but did I misunderstand the conditions?

OK, this is definitely a weakness of the script and my methodology for
checking the results.  There was already a case of a cast that I have
fixed up my script for, but this one is worse because it's under a macro.
I can look into whether the cast can be changed to add a const, but for
the time being, I think you should just drop this patch.

Thanks for the careful review.

julia

>
>
> > 3. Not passed to a top-level macro call
> > 4. No pointer or array-typed field passed to a function or stored in a
> > variable.
> > Declare structures having all of these properties as const.
> >
> > Done using Coccinelle.
> > Based on a suggestion by Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> >
> > ---
> > The semantic patch seems too long for a commit log, but is in the cover
> > letter.
> >
> >  drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c
> > index ef29f18..d0761f3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c
> > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ struct telemetry_debugfs_conf {
> >
> >  static struct telemetry_debugfs_conf *debugfs_conf;
> >
> > -static struct telemetry_debugfs_conf telem_apl_debugfs_conf = {
> > +static const struct telemetry_debugfs_conf telem_apl_debugfs_conf = {
> >  	.pss_idle_data = telem_apl_pss_idle_data,
> >  	.pcs_idle_blkd_data = telem_apl_pcs_idle_blkd_data,
> >  	.pcs_s0ix_blkd_data = telem_apl_pcs_s0ix_blkd_data,
> >
> >
>
> --
> Darren Hart
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>