[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F505AB2-9A71-4B89-8C93-83AB161A6DEA@sent.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 22:32:36 -0400
From: "Zi Yan" <zi.yan@...t.com>
To: "Naoya Horiguchi" <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] THP migration support
>
> Thanks for helping,
:)
>
> I think that you seem to do some testing with these patches on powerpc,
> which shows that thp migration can be enabled relatively easily for
> non-x86_64. This is a good news to me.
Right. I did some THP migration tests on both x86_64 and IBM ppc64.
You can use the code here to test the THP migration,
and compare the migration time between 512 base pages and 1 THP.
https://github.com/x-y-z/thp-migration-bench
NUMA (or fake NUMA) setup and libnuma are needed. Since it simply tries to
migrate pages from node 0 to node 1.
make bench should give you the result like:
THP Migration
Total time: 676.870346 us
Test successful.
-------------------
Base Page Migration
Total time: 2340.078354 us
Test successful.
>
> And I apology for my slow development over this patchset.
> My previous post was about 5 months ago, and I've not done ver.2 due to
> many interruptions. Someone also privately asked me about the progress
> of this work, so I promised ver.2 will be posted in a few weeks.
> Your patch 12/12 will come with it.
Looking forward to it. :)
—
Best Regards,
Yan Zi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (497 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists