[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161003215211.okrvsky5bgglm75p@acer>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 22:52:11 +0100
From: Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@...tmail.com>
To: Harman Kalra <harman4linux@...il.com>
Cc: laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] : Removing warnings caught by checkpatch.pl
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 02:30:45AM +0530, Harman Kalra wrote:
> static int iss_video_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq,
> - unsigned int *count, unsigned int *num_planes,
> - unsigned int sizes[], struct device *alloc_devs[])
> + unsigned int *count, unsigned int *num_planes,
> + unsigned int sizes[], struct device *alloc_devs[])
2 spaces + 3 tabs -> 2 spaces + 2 tabs? Am I seeing this correctly?
Both ways are against CodingStyle.
> - /* Try the get selection operation first and fallback to get format if not
> - * implemented.
> + /* Try the get selection operation first and
> + * fallback to get format if not implemented.
> */
This comment style is discouraged so this is at lease not perfect.
Doesn't checkpatch complain with this change? If it doesn't, could you
please also check with --strict, as long as you're working on style.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists