[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pong4oq3.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:23:16 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Marcelo Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@...ibm.com>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ibm.com>,
Paulo Flabiano Smorigo <pfsmorigo@...ibm.com>,
joy.latten@...onical.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: sha1-powerpc: little-endian support
Marcelo Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com> writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:20:15PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:15:51AM -0300, Marcelo Cerri wrote:
>> > Hi Herbert,
>> >
>> > Any thoughts on this one?
>>
>> Can this patch wait until the next merge window? On the broken
>> platforms it should just fail the self-test, right?
>
> Yes. It fails on any LE platform (including Ubuntu and RHEL 7.1).
How are you testing this? I thought I was running the crypto tests but
I've never seen this fail.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists