[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161004120737.GA16223@gallifrey>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:07:37 -0300
From: Marcelo Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@...ibm.com>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ibm.com>,
Paulo Flabiano Smorigo <pfsmorigo@...ibm.com>,
joy.latten@...onical.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: sha1-powerpc: little-endian support
Hi Michael,
On Ubuntu, CRYPTO_MANAGER_DISABLE_TESTS is set by default. So I had to
disable this config in order to make sha1-powerpc fail in the crypto API
tests. However, even with tests disabled, any usage of sha1-powerpc
should result in incorrect results.
--
Regards,
Marcelo
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:23:16PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Marcelo Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com> writes:
>
> > [ Unknown signature status ]
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:20:15PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:15:51AM -0300, Marcelo Cerri wrote:
> >> > Hi Herbert,
> >> >
> >> > Any thoughts on this one?
> >>
> >> Can this patch wait until the next merge window? On the broken
> >> platforms it should just fail the self-test, right?
> >
> > Yes. It fails on any LE platform (including Ubuntu and RHEL 7.1).
>
> How are you testing this? I thought I was running the crypto tests but
> I've never seen this fail.
>
> cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists