[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161005091042.GH29257@dell>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:10:42 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] mfd: wm8994-core: don't split lines unnecessarily
On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 05-10-16, 09:49, Lee Jones wrote:
> > You are experienced enough to know better than this.
>
> :)
>
> > a) Contentless pings have never been acceptable. If you genuinely
> > think a patch has been forgotten you should resubmit with a
> > [RESEND]. That is their entire purpose.
>
> Sure, but I really believe a light *ping* is much better than a complete resend
> to start with. It generates far less noise.
Contentless pings are generally not accepted.
It also has the unfortunate side-effect of placing your patches at the
top of the pile, and since I process patches in reverse chronological
order, you just put yourself at the back of the list. ;)
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists