[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a8ej9iso.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:44:39 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, robh@...nel.org,
Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, r.baldyga@...sung.com,
grygorii.strashko@...com,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Bird\, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation
On Wed, Oct 05 2016, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
> Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org> writes:
>>>> But you do!
>>>> The mA number from the USB configuration is passed to usb_gadget_vbus_draw.
>>>> Your patch passes that to usb_charger_set_cur_limit_by_type()
>>>> which calls __usb_charger_set_cur_limit_by_type() which will set the
>>>> cur_limit for whichever type uchger->type currently is.
>>>>
>>>> So when it is not relevant, your code *does* set some current limit.
>>>
>>> Suppose the charger type is DCP(it is not relevant to the mA number
>>> from the USB configuration ), it will not do the USB enumeration, then
>>> no USB configuration from host to set current.
>>
>> From the talking, there are some issues (thanks for Neil's comments)
>> need to be fixed as below:
>> 1. Need to add the method getting charger type from extcon subsystem.
>> 2. Need to remove the method getting charger type from power supply.
>> 3. There are still some different views about reporting the maximum
>> current or minimum current to power driver.
>>
>> Now the current v16 patchset can work well on my Spreadtrum platform
>> and Jun's NXP platform, if you like to apply this patchset then I can
I'm really curious how much testing this has had. Have you actually
plugged in different cable types (SDP DCP DCP ACA) and has each one been
detected correctly? Because I cannot see how that could happen with the
code you have posted.
>> send out new patches to fix above issues. If you don't like that, I
>> can send out new version patchset to fix above issues. Could you give
>> me some suggestions what should I do next step? Thanks.
>
> Merge window just opened, nothing will happen for about 2 weeks. How
> about you send a new version after merge window closes and we go from
> there? Fixing 1 and 2 is needed. 3 we need to consider more
> carefully. Perhaps report both minimum and maximum somehow?
>
> Neil, comments?
This probably seems a bit harsh, but I really think the current patchset
should be discarded and the the project started again with a clear
vision of what is required. What we currently have is too confused.
To respond to the points:
>> 1. Need to add the method getting charger type from extcon subsystem.
Yes. This should be the only way to get the charger type.
>> 2. Need to remove the method getting charger type from power supply.
Also need to remove the ->get_charger_type() method as there is no
credible use-case for this.
>> 3. There are still some different views about reporting the maximum
>> current or minimum current to power driver.
I think those were resolved. There was some confusion over whether a
particular power manager wanted to be told the maximum or the minimum,
but I think both have a clear use case in different hardware.
Also: We don't want another notifier_chain. The usb_notifier combined
with the extcon notifier are sufficient. Possibly it would be sensible
to replace the usb notifier with a new new notifier chain, but don't add
something without first cleaning up what is there.
Also: resolve the question of whether it could ever make sense to have
more than one "usb_charger" in a system. If it doesn't, make it an
obvious singleton. If it does, make it clear how the correct
usb_charger is chosen.
Also: think very carefully before exposing any details through sysfs.
Some of the details are already visible, either in sys/class/extcon
or sys/class/power_supply. Don't duplicate without good reason.
NeilBrown
>
> --
> balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (801 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists