[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161006062708.GA2525@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 15:27:08 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: move synchronize_sched out of slab_mutex on
shrink
Ccing Doug, original reporter.
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:56:48PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> synchronize_sched() is a heavy operation and calling it per each cache
> owned by a memory cgroup being destroyed may take quite some time. What
> is worse, it's currently called under the slab_mutex, stalling all works
> doing cache creation/destruction.
>
> Actually, there isn't much point in calling synchronize_sched() for each
> cache - it's enough to call it just once - after setting cpu_partial for
> all caches and before shrinking them. This way, we can also move it out
> of the slab_mutex, which we have to hold for iterating over the slab
> cache list.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172991
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
These two patches should be sent to stable. Isn't it?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists