[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161007153014.GC10482@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:30:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Alon Ronen <aronen@...iper.net>,
Debjit Ghosh <dghosh@...iper.net>,
Dhruva Diveneni <ddevineni@...iper.net>,
Georgi Vlaev <gvlaev@...iper.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Yu-Lin Lu <ylu@...iper.net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Juniper DT based connector driver
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:16:10PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Introduce a Juniper PTX router series DT overlay based
> connector driver.
>
> This is submitted as an RFC since some OF infrastructure
> patches (like changeset helpers etc) are not yet mainlined.
staging drivers almost always need to at least build (or if not, have a
good reason why not.)
So don't post code until people can at least test-build it, otherwise no
one will care about it. Would you review such code?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists