[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161009144004.GA21323@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 16:40:04 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Harman Kalra <harman4linux@...il.com>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, bankarsandhya512@...il.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: i4l: act2000: Fixed warning "use pr_* instead
of printk"
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 07:58:00PM +0530, Harman Kalra wrote:
> This patch replaces calls to the "printk" with appropriate "pr_*"
> function thus addressing the following warning generated by the
> checkpatch script:
>
> Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_warn([subsystem]dev, ... then
> dev_warn(dev, ... then pr_warn(... to printk(KERN_WARNING ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Harman Kalra <harman4linux@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/i4l/act2000/act2000_isa.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/i4l/act2000/act2000_isa.c b/drivers/staging/i4l/act2000/act2000_isa.c
> index ad7a039..1a91b52 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/i4l/act2000/act2000_isa.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/i4l/act2000/act2000_isa.c
> @@ -78,10 +78,10 @@
> if (istatus & ISA_ISR_ERR) {
> /* Error Interrupt */
> istatus &= ISA_ISR_ERR_MASK;
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "act2000: errIRQ\n");
> + pr_warn("act2000: errIRQ\n");
> }
> if (istatus)
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "act2000: ?IRQ %d %02x\n", card->irq, istatus);
> + pr_warn("act2000: ?IRQ %d %02x\n", card->irq, istatus);
shouldn't that be pr_debug()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists