[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:09:28 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, hekuang@...wei.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
eranian@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, chris.ryder@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Cleanup arch specific stuff
On 2016/10/10 01:24PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:29:02PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> > Move arch specific stuff from util/annotate.c to their respective
> > files in util/annotate directory.
> >
> > No functionality changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
> > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 259 +++----------------------------------
> > tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 23 ++++
> > tools/perf/util/annotate/Build | 3 +
> > tools/perf/util/annotate/arm.c | 50 +++++++
> > tools/perf/util/annotate/powerpc.c | 63 +++++++++
> > tools/perf/util/annotate/x86.c | 107 +++++++++++++++
>
> We already have a per arch area: tools/perf/arch/
I think this was done to support cross-arch annotate similar to the
remote unwind support with util/libunwind/
- Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists