[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:19:28 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, hekuang@...wei.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
eranian@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, chris.ryder@....com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Cleanup arch specific stuff
On Monday 10 October 2016 10:09 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 2016/10/10 01:24PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:29:02PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>>> Move arch specific stuff from util/annotate.c to their respective
>>> files in util/annotate directory.
>>>
>>> No functionality changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
>>> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 259 +++----------------------------------
>>> tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 23 ++++
>>> tools/perf/util/annotate/Build | 3 +
>>> tools/perf/util/annotate/arm.c | 50 +++++++
>>> tools/perf/util/annotate/powerpc.c | 63 +++++++++
>>> tools/perf/util/annotate/x86.c | 107 +++++++++++++++
>> We already have a per arch area: tools/perf/arch/
> I think this was done to support cross-arch annotate similar to the
> remote unwind support with util/libunwind/
Yes, because tools/perf/arch/ will only include host arch code.
-Ravi
> - Naveen
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists