linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Cleanup arch specific stuff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:56:16 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, hekuang@...wei.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        eranian@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        pawel.moll@....com, chris.ryder@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Cleanup arch specific stuff

Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:19:28PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> 
> 
> On Monday 10 October 2016 10:09 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > On 2016/10/10 01:24PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:29:02PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> >>> Move arch specific stuff from util/annotate.c to their respective
> >>> files in util/annotate directory.
> >>>
> >>> No functionality changes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  tools/perf/util/Build              |   1 +
> >>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c         | 259 +++----------------------------------
> >>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.h         |  23 ++++
> >>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/Build     |   3 +
> >>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/arm.c     |  50 +++++++
> >>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/powerpc.c |  63 +++++++++
> >>>  tools/perf/util/annotate/x86.c     | 107 +++++++++++++++
> >> We already have a per arch area: tools/perf/arch/
> > I think this was done to support cross-arch annotate similar to the 
> > remote unwind support with util/libunwind/
> 
> Yes, because tools/perf/arch/ will only include host arch code.

Ok, thanks for clarifying.

- Arnaldo