[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v67vZLCtUOaqBwtAnHmCMpoxmh3pxjtD5TL2nWp3Lm-Pzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:16:21 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/sun4i: tcon: Move SoC specific quirks to a DT
matched data structure
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:06:22AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> +struct sun4i_tcon_quirks {
>> + bool is_sun5i; /* sun5i has undocumented mux */
>> + bool has_channel_1; /* a33 does not have channel 1 */
>> + bool has_bypass_src; /* has separate input bypassing CEU */
>> + bool has_dma_src; /* has DMA input */
>> +};
>> +
>
> I'd really prefer to keep the has_mux quirk name. is_sun5i doesn't
> really relate to what we're doing there, is redundant with the
> compatible, and render the other quirks name useless, since we could
> just have is_sun.i quirks and deal with that (which is essentially
> what we were doing before).
Lets call it has_unknown_mux then. has_mux would be confusing with
the HDMI and MIPI DSI muxes on sun6i.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists