[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161011093659.GQ3462@lukather>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:36:59 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/sun4i: tcon: Move SoC specific quirks to a DT
matched data structure
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 05:16:21PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:06:22AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> +struct sun4i_tcon_quirks {
> >> + bool is_sun5i; /* sun5i has undocumented mux */
> >> + bool has_channel_1; /* a33 does not have channel 1 */
> >> + bool has_bypass_src; /* has separate input bypassing CEU */
> >> + bool has_dma_src; /* has DMA input */
> >> +};
> >> +
> >
> > I'd really prefer to keep the has_mux quirk name. is_sun5i doesn't
> > really relate to what we're doing there, is redundant with the
> > compatible, and render the other quirks name useless, since we could
> > just have is_sun.i quirks and deal with that (which is essentially
> > what we were doing before).
>
> Lets call it has_unknown_mux then. has_mux would be confusing with
> the HDMI and MIPI DSI muxes on sun6i.
That works for me.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists