linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Knights Mill CPUID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1780433.ynzyL9V08i@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 23:48:19 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     "Luc, Piotr" <Piotr.Luc@...el.com>
Cc:     "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com" 
        <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Knights Mill CPUID

On Thursday, October 13, 2016 02:48:28 PM Luc, Piotr wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 21:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 08:25:50 PM Piotr Luc wrote:
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > Depends-on: x86/cpu/intel: Add Knights Mill to Intel family
> > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161012180520.30976-1-piotr.luc () intel
> > > ! com
> > 
> > First, putting broken URLs into patch tags doesn't really help.
> 
> OK, with a series the link is not needed. I will refer to a patch
> inside the series.
> 
> > 
> > Second, please send all of these patches as a series where the first
> > patch makes the change the rest depends on.  That would make them
> > easier to
> > handle.
> > 
> I see. I just wonder if I should send the entire series to all
> maintainers that maintain individual modules/files or somehow limit
> 'TO' recipients only to their modules. 
> Is any good method to it correctly?

The To: list should be possibly short.  I would just send it To: x86@...nel.org
and put the other addresses into the CC list.

Generally speaking, CCs of the entire series should go to all of the relevant
maintainers (so they have a chance to respond to your patches in the context of
the series) though.

Thanks,
Rafael