linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Knights Mill CPUID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1476369859.27971.11.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:48:28 +0000
From:   "Luc, Piotr" <Piotr.Luc@...el.com>
To:     "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:     "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com" 
        <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Knights Mill CPUID

On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 21:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 08:25:50 PM Piotr Luc wrote:
> > 
> > ---
> > Depends-on: x86/cpu/intel: Add Knights Mill to Intel family
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161012180520.30976-1-piotr.luc () intel
> > ! com
> 
> First, putting broken URLs into patch tags doesn't really help.

OK, with a series the link is not needed. I will refer to a patch
inside the series.

> 
> Second, please send all of these patches as a series where the first
> patch makes the change the rest depends on.  That would make them
> easier to
> handle.
> 
I see. I just wonder if I should send the entire series to all
maintainers that maintain individual modules/files or somehow limit
'TO' recipients only to their modules. 
Is any good method to it correctly?

Thanks,
Piotr