linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 PATCH] mm/percpu.c: simplify grouping CPU algorithm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b1e98606-be69-0dd6-0a50-1b19e6237dc5@zoho.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2016 07:49:44 +0800
From:   zijun_hu <zijun_hu@...o.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     zijun_hu@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH] mm/percpu.c: simplify grouping CPU algorithm

On 2016/10/14 7:37, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Zijun.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 08:48:45PM +0800, zijun_hu wrote:
>> compared with the original algorithm theoretically and practically, the
>> new one educes the same grouping results, besides, it is more effective,
>> simpler and easier to understand.
> 
> If the original code wasn't broken and the new code produces the same
> output, I'd really not mess with this code.  There simply is no upside
> to messing with this code.  It's run once during boot and never a
> noticeable contributor of boot overhead.  Maybe the new code is a bit
> simpler and more efficient but the actual benefit is so small that any
> risk would outweigh it.
> 
> Thanks.
>
the main intent of this change is making the CPU grouping algorithm more
easily to understand, especially, for newcomer for memory managements
take me as a example, i really take me a longer timer to understand it