[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c9ba6ec-c137-fa3c-7b5b-7ea7ed58e865@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:52:50 +0100
From: Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>
CC: <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-piix4: several coding style fixes
On 14-10-2016 08:08, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:39:01PM +0100, Carlos Palminha wrote:
>> @@ -196,7 +204,7 @@ static int piix4_setup(struct pci_dev *PIIX4_dev,
>> } else {
>> pci_read_config_word(PIIX4_dev, SMBBA, &piix4_smba);
>> piix4_smba &= 0xfff0;
>> - if(piix4_smba == 0) {
>> + if (piix4_smba == 0) {
>> dev_err(&PIIX4_dev->dev, "SMBus base address "
>> "uninitialized - upgrade BIOS or use "
>> "force_addr=0xaddr\n");
>
> did you left this message in three lines on purpose?
>
Hi Uwe,
There were some missing lines. I had some doubts regarding if the
"quoted string" could go with more than 80 chars. I see now that
checkpatch is ok.
I'll resend a v3.
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
Regards,
C.Palminha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists