[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161017152043.GA502@swordfish>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:20:43 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix overflow in cpufreq_table_find_index_dl()
On (10/18/16 00:14), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 5fa55fc..2a7aa0b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -677,10 +677,10 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (best == table - 1)
> return pos - table;
>
> - return best - pos;
> + return pos - best;
> }
>
> - return best - pos;
> + return pos - best;
> }
hmm.., you know what... I'm now actually curious,
why does it do `pos - best' and not `best - table'?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists