linux-kernel - Re: [media] winbond-cir: Move a variable assignment in wbcir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <71669997-fda1-6b97-9599-4b8118a20fb7@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:05:59 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Sean Young <sean@...s.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [media] winbond-cir: Move a variable assignment in wbcir_tx()

>> * How do you think about to avoid a variable assignment in case
>> that this memory allocation failed anyhow?
> 
> There is no memory allocation that can fail at this point.

Do you really know the failure probability for a call of the
function "kmalloc" (within the function "wbcir_tx") under all
possible run time situations?


>> * Do you care for data access locality?
> 
> Not unless you can show measurable performance improvements?

Did any software developer (before me) dare anything in this direction?

Regards,
Markus