[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1476951388.21931.0.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 01:16:28 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't match against empty $const_structs
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 10:12 +0200, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> When $conststructsfile does not exist or is empty, we may get false
> warnings such as:
> WARNING: struct should normally be const
>
> Fix that by not running the string match if $const_structs is empty.
Why should $const_structs ever be empty?
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index a8368d1..722a319 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -6010,7 +6010,8 @@ sub process {
> }
>
> # check for various structs that are normally const (ops, kgdb, device_tree)
> - if ($line !~ /\bconst\b/ &&
> + if ($const_structs ne "" &&
> + $line !~ /\bconst\b/ &&
> $line =~ /\bstruct\s+($const_structs)\b/) {
> WARN("CONST_STRUCT",
> "struct $1 should normally be const\n" .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists