[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc553cb0-5bd5-ea08-bfc4-c75d2ce0ddf3@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:18:00 +0200
From: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't match against empty $const_structs
On 10/20/2016 10:16 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 10:12 +0200, Jerome Forissier wrote:
>> When $conststructsfile does not exist or is empty, we may get false
>> warnings such as:
>> WARNING: struct should normally be const
>>
>> Fix that by not running the string match if $const_structs is empty.
>
> Why should $const_structs ever be empty?
When running out-of-tree, i.e., using checkpatch.pl on non-kernel sources.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> index a8368d1..722a319 100755
>> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> @@ -6010,7 +6010,8 @@ sub process {
>> }
>>
>> # check for various structs that are normally const (ops, kgdb, device_tree)
>> - if ($line !~ /\bconst\b/ &&
>> + if ($const_structs ne "" &&
>> + $line !~ /\bconst\b/ &&
>> $line =~ /\bstruct\s+($const_structs)\b/) {
>> WARN("CONST_STRUCT",
>> "struct $1 should normally be const\n" .
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists