linux-kernel - Re: x32 is broken in 4.9-rc1 due to "x86/signal: Add SA_{X32,IA32}_ABI sa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610201117380.5073@nanos>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:24:02 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
cc:     Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x32 is broken in 4.9-rc1 due to "x86/signal: Add SA_{X32,IA32}_ABI
 sa_flags"

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> could you give attached patch a shot?

Can you please stop sending attached patches? It's a pain to look at them
and it makes it hard to reply inline.

I applied it and rewrote the changelog because the one liner you slapped
into it is more than useless. Ditto for the completely misleading subject
line. Please be more careful with that. 

Thanks,

	tglx