linux-kernel - Re: x32 is broken in 4.9-rc1 due to "x86/signal: Add SA_{X32,IA32}_ABI sa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJwJo6YAgYqtdrPH+Gk5jEse_hSLme8_YwSp7U-CdEWfMZe5eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:00:51 +0300
From:   Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x32 is broken in 4.9-rc1 due to "x86/signal: Add
 SA_{X32,IA32}_ABI sa_flags"

2016-10-20 12:24 GMT+03:00 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
>> could you give attached patch a shot?
>
> Can you please stop sending attached patches? It's a pain to look at them
> and it makes it hard to reply inline.

Sure, I've planned to resend it after get tested-by or when I test
on x32 by myself. Sorry about attaching and changelog.

> I applied it and rewrote the changelog because the one liner you slapped
> into it is more than useless. Ditto for the completely misleading subject
> line. Please be more careful with that.

Thanks, Thomas!

-- 
             Dmitry