linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161020110109.GE10234@leverpostej>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:01:09 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jan Glauber <jglauber@...ium.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:55:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:44:18AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > I think there's general confusion over the use of invalid context.
> > Perhaps we could clear that up with:
> > 
> > #define perf_uncore_context	perf_invalid_context
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > s/perf_hw_context/perf_cpu_hw_context/
> 
> What might be missing is the fact that these are _TASK_ contexts.

Yes, that too.

> New names might clarify things a little though.

I'll add that to the list of cleanup/rework I've been meaning to look
at.

Thanks,
Mark.