[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161020101747.GT3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:17:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bin.gao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:57:03AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Bin Gao wrote:
> > @@ -702,6 +702,15 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For Atom SoCs TSC is the only reliable clocksource.
> > + * Mark TSC reliable so no watchdog on it.
> > + */
> > + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT)
> > + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE);
> > +
AFAICT setting TSC_RELIABLE also skips the check_tsc_warp() tests in
tsc_sync.c.
This means that if someone does a Goldmont BIOS with 'features', we'll
never detect the wreckage :-/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists