linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ACPI / gpio: Add support for naming GPIOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:08:33 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ACPI / gpio: Add support for naming GPIOs

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:02:34PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > DT has property 'gpio-line-names' to name GPIO lines the controller has if
> > present. Use this very same property in ACPI as well to provide nice names
> > for the GPIOS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Looks OK to me, is this patch independent so I can merge it into the
> GPIO tree or does it need to go in with patch 1/4 to the ACPI tree?

This (2/4) and the 3/4 are independent of patch 1/4 so they can go via
any tree.