[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZhWj8ZeEhZ06OFKq2BEZbVxcG5_zd9WcoOrn6vRACOwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:10:39 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI / gpio: Allow holes in list of GPIOs for a device
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Make it possible to have an empty GPIOs in a GPIO list for device. For
> example a SPI master may use both GPIOs and native pins as chip selects and
> we need to be able to distinguish between the two.
>
> This makes it mandatory to have exactly 3 arguments for GPIOs and then
> converts gpiolib to use of __acpi_node_get_property_reference() instead. In
> addition we make acpi_gpio_package_count() to handle holes as well (this
> matches the DT version).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Looks OK.
Do I need someone's ACK to merge stuff under
Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt?
Like Rafael?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists