[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1476968182.23693.14.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:56:27 +0000
From: "Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
To: "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
CC: "hal.rosenstock@...il.com" <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] IB/rdmavt: cq ktrhead worker fix and API update
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 14:07 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> The kthread worker API has been improved in 4.9-rc1. The 2nd
> patch uses the new functions and simplifies the kthread worker
> creation and destroying.
>
> I have found a possible race when working on the API conversion.
> A proposed fix is in the 1st patch.
>
> Both changes are compile tested only. I did not find an easy way
> how to test them at runtime.
>
> Petr Mladek (2):
> IB/rdmavt: Avoid queuing work into a destroyed cq kthread worker
> IB/rdmavt: Handle the kthread worker using the new API
>
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/cq.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++----------
> ------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Thanks for the patches. I'm going to take a closer look, I just now
seen these.
-Denny
Powered by blists - more mailing lists