linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic pinconf functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZHTQqnsuHcm3+iYQJc2picLu95W2OKeMiXFq+XNzDV3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:13:29 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic pinconf functions

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:

> This series fixes up generic pinconf support for the sunxi pinctrl driver
> library. The driver was doing some bits wrong, like a) storing the pinconf
> config value in its struct, and not actually reading the hardware to get
> the current config, and b) not using the right arguments for the bias
> parameters.

Looks OK to me, Maxime are you OK with me applying this, or
are we waiting for a new iteration of this patch set?

I have started to apply Maxime's generic binding rework, will it
clash with these?

Yours,
Linus Walleij