[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASAJt33-cKxOTqCWXb2A6Ky3rhE0ZOMSone4-JUAxO9OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:02:01 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig.h: remove config_enabled() macro
Hi Paul,
2016-10-20 21:44 GMT+09:00 Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>:
> [Added Nicolas.]
>
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 21:06 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2016-10-20 19:04 GMT+09:00 Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>:
>> > On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 20:07 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> > There are about a dozen instances of IS_ENABLED() that target something
>> > other than a kconfig macros. Are you planning to convert those to
>> > __is_defined() too?
>>
>> I did not notice that, but looks like there are some to be checked.
>
> Are you willing to do that or should I give it a try (after this patch
> has landed, of course)?
If you volunteer to do it,
that'll be appreciated.
If you CC me, I am happy to review the patches.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists