lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dbeca0a-65ad-3a1c-2fe5-60023d83dabd@victronenergy.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:30:36 +0200
From:   Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
        "Grygorii Strashko" <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cpsw: fix obtaining mac address for am3517

Hello Tony,


On 21-10-16 09:53, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com> [161021 00:37]:
>> Hello Tony,
>>
>> On 21-10-16 08:38, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com> [161020 12:57]:
>>>> Commit b6745f6e4e63 ("drivers: net: cpsw: davinci_emac: move reading mac
>>>> id to common file") did not only move the code for an am3517, it also
>>>> added the slave parameter, resulting in a invalid (all zero) mac address
>>>> being returned. So change it back to always read from slave zero, so it
>>>> works again.
>>> Hmm doesn't this now break it for cpsw with two instances?
>>>
>> Yes, well, they get the same mac address at least. But does it matter?
>> This changes davinci_emac_3517_get_macid, the only way to get there
>> is:
>>
>>      if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "ti,am3517-emac"))
>>          return davinci_emac_3517_get_macid(dev, 0x110, slave, mac_addr)
>>
>> and the only user of ti,am3517-emac is arch/arm/boot/dts/am3517.dtsi,
>> which only has one emac. So the change is already am3517 specific.
>>
>>> We may need am3517 specific quirk flag instead?
>> Given above, it is already am3517 specific. Let me know if you prefer this
>> route then I will have a look at it.
> Oh OK thanks for explaining it :) As it's already am3517 specific:
>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

Aaah, lets wait a sec. I just saw there is another user of this function,
so above is simply not true....

     if (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra7"))
         return davinci_emac_3517_get_macid(dev, 0x514, slave, mac_addr);


So let me check if I don't break that one..... or better, let me send a 
v2, which
changes the caller to pass slave as 0 here?

     if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "ti,am3517-emac"))
         return davinci_emac_3517_get_macid(dev, 0x110, slave, mac_addr);

Regards,
Jeroen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ