[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161023132343.GA466@swordfish>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:23:43 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kdb: Call vkdb_printf() from vprintk_default() only
when wanted
On (10/21/16 14:50), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index d5e397315473..db73e33811e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -1941,7 +1941,9 @@ int vprintk_default(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> int r;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KGDB_KDB
> - if (unlikely(kdb_trap_printk)) {
> + /* Allow to pass printk() to kdb but avoid a recursion. */
> + if (unlikely(kdb_trap_printk &&
> + kdb_printf_cpu != smp_processor_id())) {
^^^^^
aren't we are in preemptible here?
-ss
> r = vkdb_printf(KDB_MSGSRC_PRINTK, fmt, args);
> return r;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists