[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3917157.z59pS4HJyr@skinner>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:11:25 +0200
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCHv2] cpupower: Correct return type of cpu_power_is_cpu_online in cpufreq
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 01:42:49 PM Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 04:23 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > When converting to a shared library in ac5a181d065d ("cpupower: Add
> > cpuidle parts into library"), cpu_freq_cpu_exists was converted to
> > cpupower_is_cpu_online. cpu_req_cpu_exists returned 0 on success and
> > -ENOSYS on failure whereas cpupower_is_cpu_online returns 1 on success.
> > Check for the correct return value in cpufreq-set.
> >
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374212
> >
> > Fixes: ac5a181d065d ("cpupower: Add cpuidle parts into library")
> > Reported-by: Julian Seward <jseward@....org>
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Drop another redundant cpupower_is_cpu_online
>
> Reviewed-by:Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>
I wanted to go through all recently sent patches and adjust rebase them to
my lates changes.
But I guess the fact that I push this from day to day because of other
stuff should not hold off such important fixes.
I collect and review all others as well the next day(s)..
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists