[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4a1b8f6-8e21-eef3-fcf9-394cfa1d3216@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:58:43 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: return -EFAULT on failed access_ok for
arc_usr_cmpxchg syscall
On 24/10/16 16:56, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/24/2016 03:47 AM, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> arc_usr_cmpxchg currently returns an uninitialized value in ret
>> on a failed access_ok call. Instead, return -EFAULT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arc/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/process.c b/arch/arc/kernel/process.c
>> index a746008..9ae3e1c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/process.c
>> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/process.c
>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(arc_usr_cmpxchg, int *, uaddr, int, expected, int, new)
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(int)))
>> - return ret;
>> + return -EFAULT;
>>
>> preempt_disable();
>
> Thx for spotting this. Since this is new code, not yet merged, do you mind if I
> squash it with orig patch. I can add a Reviewed-by a SOB as you prefer.
Sure, squash it int and add me as a Reviewed-by.
Colin
>
> Thx,
> -Vineet
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists