[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161024194917.g5oezqc4uacsyt24@lukather>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:49:17 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl
bindings
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:03:59AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now,
> > even though we still support the old one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> Patch applied.
Thanks a lot.
However, it looks like the first patch from this serie is missing from
your tree, is there a reason for that?
Also, in order to preserve bisectability, could you create an
immutable branch for those sunxi patches so that I can merge the DT
bits?
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists