linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1610241539590.7014@namei.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:44:17 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

>   (1) CaitSith can use both string / numeric arguments (like TOMOYO and
>       AppArmor) and security labels (like SELinux and Smack). There is no
>       reason that access control implementation must not use both.
> 

I believe that AppArmor will be gaining more support for security labels.

JJ: is that correct?


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>