linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10305c6c-2793-f03f-a93a-fafc4a3acb01@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:39:03 -0700
From:   John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module

On 10/23/2016 09:44 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> 
>>   (1) CaitSith can use both string / numeric arguments (like TOMOYO and
>>       AppArmor) and security labels (like SELinux and Smack). There is no
>>       reason that access control implementation must not use both.
>>
> 
> I believe that AppArmor will be gaining more support for security labels.
> 
> JJ: is that correct?
> 
yes, it will