linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/14] staging: fsl-mc: misc whitespace cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161025074515.GB22581@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:45:15 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, agraf@...e.de, arnd@...db.de,
        german.rivera@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        leoyang.li@....com, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] staging: fsl-mc: misc whitespace cleanup

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:43:16PM -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
> 
> Make whitespace consistent with other fsl-mc source files.
>   -delete extraneous tabs
>   -align start of function arguments properly
>   -for structs and function definitions, separate type and
>    variable name by a single space
>   -remove multiple blank lines in comments

That's a lot of different types of whitespace cleanups to do all at
once, can I get some sort of verification that this produces the same .o
files?

I wouldn't accept a patch like this from anyone else, why should it be
ok for you to send it?

thanks,

greg k-h