linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 02/13] of: Remove excessive printks to reduce clutter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:51:01 +0300
From:   Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/13] of: Remove excessive printks to reduce clutter

Hi Rob, Frank,

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 15:21 , Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:58 PM,  <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
> 
> Maybe some should be debug?
> 

Yes, please do not get rid of them completely.
Leave them at least as debug level so that if there’s a problem
there’s a way to figure out why something happened.

>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/resolver.c | 28 ----------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/resolver.c b/drivers/of/resolver.c
>> index 4ff0220d7aa2..93a7ca0bf98c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/resolver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/resolver.c
>> @@ -116,8 +116,6 @@ static int __of_adjust_phandle_ref(struct device_node *node,
>> 
>>        propval = kmalloc(rprop->length, GFP_KERNEL);
>>        if (!propval) {
>> -               pr_err("%s: Could not copy value of '%s'\n",
>> -                               __func__, rprop->name);
>>                return -ENOMEM;
>>        }
> 
> I would remove the brackets in this patch rather than separately.
> 
>>        memcpy(propval, rprop->value, rprop->length);


Regards

— Pantelis