[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161027123219.GA757@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:32:19 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com, sbates@...thin.com,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, haggaie@...lanox.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jim.macdonald@...rspin.com, Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] iopmem : A block device for PCIe memory
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 01:22:49PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Christoph, did you manage to leap to the future and solve the
> RDMA persistency hole? :)
>
> e.g. what happens with O_DSYNC in this model? Or you did
> a message exchange for commits?
Yes, pNFS calls this the layoutcommit. That being said once we get a RDMA
commit or flush operation we could easily make the layoutcommit optional
for some operations. There already is a precedence for the in the
flexfiles layout specification.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists