[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161027083010.2d31e50e@t450s.home>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:30:10 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<kraxel@...hat.com>, <cjia@...dia.com>, <jike.song@...el.com>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
<bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 04/12] vfio iommu: Add support for
mediated devices
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:01:51 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com> wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 12:50 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 18/10/16 08:22, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> >> VFIO IOMMU drivers are designed for the devices which are IOMMU capable.
> >> Mediated device only uses IOMMU APIs, the underlying hardware can be
> >> managed by an IOMMU domain.
> >>
> >> Aim of this change is:
> >> - To use most of the code of TYPE1 IOMMU driver for mediated devices
> >> - To support direct assigned device and mediated device in single module
> >>
> >> Added two new callback functions to struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops. Backend
> >> IOMMU module that supports pining and unpinning pages for mdev devices
> >> should provide these functions.
> >> Added APIs for pining and unpining pages to VFIO module. These calls back
> >> into backend iommu module to actually pin and unpin pages.
> >>
> >> This change adds pin and unpin support for mediated device to TYPE1 IOMMU
> >> backend module. More details:
> >> - When iommu_group of mediated devices is attached, task structure is
> >> cached which is used later to pin pages and page accounting.
> >
> >
> > For SPAPR TCE IOMMU driver, I ended up caching mm_struct with
> > atomic_inc(&container->mm->mm_count) (patches are on the way) instead of
> > using @current or task as the process might be gone while VFIO container is
> > still alive and @mm might be needed to do proper cleanup; this might not be
> > an issue with this patchset now but still you seem to only use @mm from
> > task_struct.
> >
>
> Consider the example of QEMU process which creates VFIO container, QEMU
> in its teardown path would release the container. How could container be
> alive when process is gone?
If QEMU is sent a SIGKILL, does the process still exist? We must be
able to perform cleanup regardless of the state, or existence, of the
task that created it. Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists