[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6778e7ea-cb78-39b0-935f-1eaf50ecd341@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:29:14 +0530
From: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<kraxel@...hat.com>, <cjia@...dia.com>, <jike.song@...el.com>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
<bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 04/12] vfio iommu: Add support for
mediated devices
On 10/27/2016 8:00 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:01:51 +0530
> Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/27/2016 12:50 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 18/10/16 08:22, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>>>> VFIO IOMMU drivers are designed for the devices which are IOMMU capable.
>>>> Mediated device only uses IOMMU APIs, the underlying hardware can be
>>>> managed by an IOMMU domain.
>>>>
>>>> Aim of this change is:
>>>> - To use most of the code of TYPE1 IOMMU driver for mediated devices
>>>> - To support direct assigned device and mediated device in single module
>>>>
>>>> Added two new callback functions to struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops. Backend
>>>> IOMMU module that supports pining and unpinning pages for mdev devices
>>>> should provide these functions.
>>>> Added APIs for pining and unpining pages to VFIO module. These calls back
>>>> into backend iommu module to actually pin and unpin pages.
>>>>
>>>> This change adds pin and unpin support for mediated device to TYPE1 IOMMU
>>>> backend module. More details:
>>>> - When iommu_group of mediated devices is attached, task structure is
>>>> cached which is used later to pin pages and page accounting.
>>>
>>>
>>> For SPAPR TCE IOMMU driver, I ended up caching mm_struct with
>>> atomic_inc(&container->mm->mm_count) (patches are on the way) instead of
>>> using @current or task as the process might be gone while VFIO container is
>>> still alive and @mm might be needed to do proper cleanup; this might not be
>>> an issue with this patchset now but still you seem to only use @mm from
>>> task_struct.
>>>
>>
>> Consider the example of QEMU process which creates VFIO container, QEMU
>> in its teardown path would release the container. How could container be
>> alive when process is gone?
>
> If QEMU is sent a SIGKILL, does the process still exist? We must be
> able to perform cleanup regardless of the state, or existence, of the
> task that created it. Thanks,
>
The kernel closes all open file descriptors when any process is
terminated, so .release() from struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops gets called
on SIGKILL or SIGTERM and release() function do all cleanup.
Kirti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists